Which one is lower in calories?
Skipjack Tuna is lower in calories based on available per-100g estimates, when both values are available.
Nutrition comparisonCalories and macros
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast vs Skipjack Tuna: Calories and Nutrition Comparison
Compare Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast and Skipjack Tuna by calories, protein, carbs, fat, and nutrition profile. Nutrition values can vary by serving size, preparation method, and brand.
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast
142 kcal
Skipjack Tuna
103 kcal
Higher protein choice
Skipjack Tuna
Lower sugar choice
Similar
Snapshot
Side-by-side Nutrition Summary
Per-100g estimates from the EatCheck food database. Missing values remain visible as Not available.
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast
Skipjack Tuna
Snapshot
Nutrition Comparison Table
Nutrient
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast
Skipjack Tuna
Difference
Note
Calories
142 kcal
103 kcal
39 kcal
Skipjack Tuna is lower for calories per 100g.
Protein
21.3 g
22 g
0.7 g
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast is lower for protein per 100g.
Carbs
0 g
0 g
0 g
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast and Skipjack Tuna are similar for carbs.
Fat
5.6 g
1 g
4.6 g
Skipjack Tuna is lower for fat per 100g.
Fiber
0 g
0 g
0 g
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast and Skipjack Tuna are similar for fiber.
Sugar
0 g
0 g
0 g
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast and Skipjack Tuna are similar for sugar.
Sodium
54 mg
37 mg
17 mg
Skipjack Tuna is lower for sodium per 100g.
Better Choice Summary
Better Choice Summary
Lower calorie choice
Skipjack Tuna
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
Higher protein choice
Skipjack Tuna
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
Lower sugar choice
Similar
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
More filling choice
Skipjack Tuna
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
Questions
Quick Comparison Answers
Which one has more protein?
Skipjack Tuna has more protein based on available per-100g estimates, when both values are available.
Which one may be better for weight management?
Skipjack Tuna may be the lighter calorie choice, while Skipjack Tuna may offer more protein. The better fit depends on serving size, the rest of the meal, and your overall eating goals.
Foods
View Individual Nutrition Guides
Questions
FAQ
Which has more calories, Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast or Skipjack Tuna?
Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast has more calories per 100g, based on available EatCheck estimates.
Which has more protein, Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast or Skipjack Tuna?
Skipjack Tuna has more protein per 100g, based on available EatCheck estimates.
Is Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast healthier than Skipjack Tuna?
It depends on serving size, preparation, and your overall meal pattern. Compare calories, protein, fiber, sugar, sodium, and portion size rather than treating either food as automatically healthier.
Which is better for weight loss, Beef Bottom Sirloin Tri-Tip Roast or Skipjack Tuna?
The better fit may be the option with a portion size and nutrition profile that supports your overall calorie needs. EatCheck provides estimates and context, not weight-loss promises.
Can EatCheck compare foods from photos?
EatCheck can help scan meals from photos or text and provide estimated calories, macros, and nutrition context for easier food comparisons.
Compare
Related Comparisons
Questions
Related Nutrition Questions
Want to check your meal instantly?
Use EatCheck to scan meals, estimate calories, and get nutrition insights from photos or text.
