Which one is lower in calories?
Stir-fried Greens is lower in calories based on available per-100g estimates, when both values are available.
Nutrition comparisonCalories and macros
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) vs Stir-fried Greens: Calories and Nutrition Comparison
Compare Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) and Stir-fried Greens by calories, protein, carbs, fat, and nutrition profile. Nutrition values can vary by serving size, preparation method, and brand.
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt)
90 kcal
Stir-fried Greens
45 kcal
Higher protein choice
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt)
Lower sugar choice
Stir-fried Greens
Snapshot
Side-by-side Nutrition Summary
Per-100g estimates from the EatCheck food database. Missing values remain visible as Not available.
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt)
Stir-fried Greens
Snapshot
Nutrition Comparison Table
Nutrient
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt)
Stir-fried Greens
Difference
Note
Calories
90 kcal
45 kcal
45 kcal
Stir-fried Greens is lower for calories per 100g.
Protein
2 g
1.5 g
0.5 g
Stir-fried Greens is lower for protein per 100g.
Carbs
20.7 g
3.5 g
17.2 g
Stir-fried Greens is lower for carbs per 100g.
Fat
0.2 g
2.5 g
2.3 g
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) is lower for fat per 100g.
Fiber
3.3 g
2 g
1.3 g
Stir-fried Greens is lower for fiber per 100g.
Sugar
6.5 g
1 g
5.5 g
Stir-fried Greens is lower for sugar per 100g.
Sodium
36 mg
300 mg
264 mg
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) is lower for sodium per 100g.
Better Choice Summary
Better Choice Summary
Lower calorie choice
Stir-fried Greens
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
Higher protein choice
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt)
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
Lower sugar choice
Stir-fried Greens
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
More filling choice
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt)
This may vary depending on serving size and preparation method.
Questions
Quick Comparison Answers
Which one has more protein?
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) has more protein based on available per-100g estimates, when both values are available.
Which one may be better for weight management?
Stir-fried Greens may be the lighter calorie choice, while Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) may offer more protein. The better fit depends on serving size, the rest of the meal, and your overall eating goals.
Foods
View Individual Nutrition Guides
Questions
FAQ
Which has more calories, Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) or Stir-fried Greens?
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) has more calories per 100g, based on available EatCheck estimates.
Which has more protein, Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) or Stir-fried Greens?
Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) has more protein per 100g, based on available EatCheck estimates.
Is Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) healthier than Stir-fried Greens?
It depends on serving size, preparation, and your overall meal pattern. Compare calories, protein, fiber, sugar, sodium, and portion size rather than treating either food as automatically healthier.
Which is better for weight loss, Baked sweet potato (flesh only, no salt) or Stir-fried Greens?
The better fit may be the option with a portion size and nutrition profile that supports your overall calorie needs. EatCheck provides estimates and context, not weight-loss promises.
Can EatCheck compare foods from photos?
EatCheck can help scan meals from photos or text and provide estimated calories, macros, and nutrition context for easier food comparisons.
Compare
Related Comparisons
Questions
Related Nutrition Questions
Want to check your meal instantly?
Use EatCheck to scan meals, estimate calories, and get nutrition insights from photos or text.
